Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Forced to defend indefinitely, congress democrats have problems with rational arguments against the fight against the removal of waste, fraud and abuse exposed to Elon Musk Government Efficiency Department (Doge). The combination of legal nitpics, personal attacks and apocalyptic warnings reflects access to scattering that did not suit Doge’s clear populist attraction.
The case in question – April Revelation of Executive Director Valor Antonio Gracias which Doge They discovered about 2.1 million numbers of social security insurance that were non-residents in the 2024, many of which were used to access social programs. Democrats have mostly refused to deal with argument, offering only rejection, aversion and attacks ad hominem.
Delaware senator Chris Coons caused a fox news’ Martha Maccallum fox News when he tried to reduce the fraud in an interview on April 2. Acknowledging only one type of fraud in which the rate of the low rate is alleged and then turned in the attacks of ad hominem on the Elona male.
The Biden Senator of the parent state remained abolished after Maccallum pressed him on the solvency of the program, asking, “What did Democrats do to find waste, fraud and social security abuse?” The cosons could only be disassembled. Democrats did nothing to prevent non -solvency. There is no good argument.
Likewise, the leader of Senate minority Chuck Schumer has problems finding a convincing line of attack. He resorted to the claim that Trump and Musk were engaged in deep corruption and independently, even while exposing Deep corruption and the self-administration of the non-profit machine of Democrats.
Schumer’s tactic is even less effective in the light of the recently discovered 1995 clip, in which Schumer himself sounds unconscious. . . Doge. “Everything where we go, people say, why you can’t prevent illegal immigrants and others to come here,” says Chuck Schumer of 1995. “And the number one response we give to our voters is when they come here, they can get a job, get used to the law for fraud,” he says self-legal. It seems that Schumer from 1995 made more sense than this Schumer 2025.
Apocalyptic warnings do not seem to act. Maryland, Ambassador Jamie Rskin, called Dogea with a state -stroke “from the shadow”. In February, he applied for FOIA to which he and Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly Doge as “oligarchic techno-states”. In an interview, Rskin claimed, “It’s a dystopian nightmare that takes place before our eyes.”
Click here for more Fox News opinions
This alarmism and a terrible tone are directly in conflict with public mood. Newsweek reports that 65 percent of democrats support waste cut through expenditures. This cold vision of government management has suddenly opposed $ 140 billion savings that Doge has already documented. Voters do not see savings as an existential threat.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Even the democrats of mocking references to a young dog employee as “big balls” just served that a young man would become a kind of folk hero.
Democrats ultimately make a fatal mistake opposing Doge’s success, abolishing fraud with US dollars of taxpayers. They seem to be fraud and waste. And without a sustainable, reasonable alternative to common sense, their attacks fall on deaf ears and leave the majority to ask themselves, “What are the democrats actually advocate?”
Click here to read more than Jason Chaffetz
