UK Treasury rejects farmers’ proposed compromise on inheritance tax

Unlock the editor’s digest in free

FT editor Raula Khalaf selected his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Despite the growing pressure to revisit the policy, the treasury refuses to entertain a compromise that is forwarded by farmer groups to soften the impact of tax reform in the field of agriculture.

Farmer leaders proposed a Klwak process that they said that family farms would earn similar revenue while protecting from tariffs during a long-awaited meeting Treasury Officer and industry.

These groups – National Pharmars Union, the Tenant Pharmars Association and the Country Land and Business Association – have criticized Chancellor Rovel Reeves ‘decision to end the farmers’ death sentence in October.

However, the ministers told the parties that the government would not return to its proposed reforms, which warned the industry as a threat to the UK food protection.

NFU President Tom Bradshow says “reaction from our members is one of the rage, one of the true wrath, one of the frustrations we have seen in recent months,”

“We went to the treasury with a solution. We have recognized the financial hole in the country, “he added. “But at the moment the door is closed from the treasury.”

Clubback – Tax lawyer Dan Nidol first advised the Tax Policy Associates last year – agricultural resources simply attract this tariff when sold in the agreed period after inheritance.

The parties argued that it would better notice the rich people who would use tax relief.

CLA president Victoria Vivian said, “We have presented a compulsory alternative but the government is deaf,” he added that the policy was “ideological” that he believed the government’s decision to dig the government’s heels.

“I really didn’t want to think that it was ideological, but the money is not big enough to justify the attack on our art,” he said.

An official briefed Reeve’s thoughts that the Chancellor was promised to be determined to move forward with the plan. The officer said, “We never suggested that there would be alleviated there.” “We strongly believe this is a fair and balanced deal.” Treasury did not immediately respond to any request for comment.

The reforms mean that from April 20226, the agricultural landowners will be married to a 20 percent tariff between £ 1.5 million to $ 1 million, depending on whether their homeowners are married and their homeowners.

This decision has led to an important political response and encouraged the peasant community.

Last week, Prime Minister Sir Care Starmar was forced to visit a housing development in Milton Kenes, while a group of farmers in tractors disrupted the presence of the tractors. During a tractor protest in London last week, Starmar emphasized that “farming is the leading top of farming”.

Opposition parties have condemned these reforms, and the issue has taken a lot of sides for the peasant groups on the issue.

After the meeting, Shadow Environment Secretary Victoria Atkins said the labor was “clearly not thought of the rural community”.

He also added: “Unlike the words that come out of the mouth of the Care Starmer, it is further confirmed that farmers are under the list of labor priority.”

Liberal Democrat Environment and Rural Affairs spokesman Tim Farn said the government “has thrown farmers to wolves”.

He cautioned that “Family firm tax coffin could be the final nail of the coffin to fight for many communities”.

Some of the government’s own backbankers also called for reforms to soften.

Last Monday, the Labor MPs proposed tweets to raise the price of the farm, to establish the price of the farm, to establish a nail -back system, or to create a “active farmer exam” to create a nail -back system.