UK embarks on biggest arms drive since cold war

Unlock the editor’s digest in free

FT editor Raula Khalaf selected his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Sir Kieir Starmer told MPS on Tuesday that Britain was facing a “everything in the world where everything has changed”, as he disintegrated the country’s foreign aid budget for money for a reaction program that has not been seen since the Cold War.

The Commons of the Commons had an idea on a Monday Stars Britain and the rest of Europe were known as the “Great Postware Order” because of the explosive influence of Donald Trump.

Speed ​​is accelerated. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the UK on Wednesday, will meet with the EU finance ministers at the G20 meeting in Cape Town to discuss a new funding system to rebuild the continent.

President Trump met at the White House on Thursday to apply for a US protection guarantee in Europe, while the UK Premier is watching a new defense discussion with European leaders in London on Sunday.

In the jerks of the activities, Britain’s foreign policy has been transferred overnight. A country that once proud of itself as a “aid power” that spent 0.7 percent of its national income with foreign assistance is now less liberal now.

Starmer said, “This is not a announcement that I am happy to make,” he revealed that the assistance budget was already cut to 0.5 percent during the ex -conservative Chancellor Ish Sunak epidemic, only to 0.3 percent in 2027.

Like the UK growth itself, the decision to launch the AID budget can win in favor of Trump’s approval, whose administration has begun to break the USAID, USAID.

It was a wonderful moment: Conservative’s “Curious Chancellor” George Osburn maintained 0.7 percent of assistance in his budget-slashing years in the Treasury after a financial accident. Now a labor prime minister was taking an ax.

Starmar emphasized that he had to provide resources to achieve “peace through energy”, cast himself as a defender of Labor Statesman Clemicman Atley and Ernest Bevin, partially to transaATTICS settlement.

He said that it was a “proud legacy”, however, that the saving work was “without mentioning Trump’s name” it was not as light as once “.

Analysts claim Starmar’s claim that defense expenditure has increased from 2.5 percent of GDP to 2.5 percent – and perhaps the next parliament is probably 5 percent – the biggest planned increase in UK’s defense expenditure since the second world end was war.

Royal United Services Institute Deputy Director of Think-Tank, Malcolm Chamrs, said, “Dual Promise-2.5 percent by 20227 and 5 percent by 20 percent by 20, will be the most sustainable growth in defense time.” Transfer the ministry to “long -term planning and power to promise”.

He also added that “to see if the spotlight is now in Germany and France to see if they can also look at the challenge to see if they can also look at the defense of the continent.”

Senior figures of the military and defense circles were welcomed by the Senior Personalities of those who said it was extra, but the former NATO Secretary-General Lord George Robertson who led the prime minister’s strategic defense and protection review, which would give more ornaments to Will George Robertson , Which will be this spring report.

Former National Safety Advisor Lord Peter Ricketts said that the cost of spending “if the starma continued to lead it was essential, if [French President Emmanuel] Macron, European response to Trump and the rise of the European protection he has emerged “.

He also added that the most important priority was to re -equip the British Army, which was “behind the decade of investment” and the latest overhul for deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan, “credible for use in Europe”.

Earlier on Tuesday, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch called on to “rebuild” the assistance to increase defense expenses – “at least short term” – and advised that some welfare expenses could also be redirected.

In a speech at London-based policy Exchange Think-Tank, he will support the starmer “in difficult decisions” to increase defense expenses.

The current assistance of 0.5 percent of gross national income has been seen as weak in further cutting the target because senior diplomats and former mandarins have expressed concern that the foreign office budget will be stopped in the upcoming expenditure review.

This move has given rise to anger from the propagandists who are already criticized to support more than a quarter of the UK assistance budget to support Britain asylum seekers and refugees. Starmer said that the goal was to reduce the shelter bill.

Romili Greenhill, Chief Executive of the UK Network for NGOs, was hit in the “short and horrible move by both Prime Minister and Treasury”, which he said that “will have destructive consequences for millions of marginalized people worldwide” and desire “to our own national security interest Make vulnerable ”.

However, some British diplomats personally supported Starmar’s move. One said, “This is the best way to help any volunteer number that is very questionable,” one said.