EY accused of ‘serious’ failings in audits of collapsed NMC Health

Unlock the editor’s digest in free

FT editor Raula Khalaf selected his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

UK accounting watchdog NMC has identified “very serious” failure in the YMC Health, a London court on Monday heard that a trial for the FTSE 100 group of the Big Four Farm was broken into the scandal in 2021.

The controller’s search in the High Court was accused of negligence in the High Court, and when the hospital operator failed, the credits were demanding about $ 2 billion from the firm.

Alvarez and Marsal claims EYO Auditors have missed a series of “red flag” before the NMC collapsed after the release of billions of dollars hidden Debts. The scandal has given rise to a wide legal claim and a regulatory investigation of London, New York and Abu Dhabi.

EY denied any negligence in his work by signing the NMC accounts. In the arguments written in the court, the firm argued that it was a “main goal” of a “broad” fraud, adding that it had no responsibility or the power to uncover this national wrong. The EYA is expected to start its defense on Wednesday, the trial will run until October.

Administrators have claimed that EY NMC’s General Laser failed to test a key financial article by holding a record of transaction, arguing that it could publish the complaint fraud.

They also claim that the EY NMC’s banks did not properly control contact, depending on them before they rely on them to confirm the company’s financial position by the NMC executives.

The Financial Reporting Council, which controls the UK auditors, is conducting its own investigation on EY’s work at Abu Dhabi -based NMC and has not yet announced its decisions. However, the details of the temporary inquiry of the regulator were published in the court on Monday.

In support of their negligence, lawyers on behalf of the administrators quoted an FRC that failed to perform the “adequate monitoring method of EY in his work in the NMC account, and practice professional skepticism.”

The FRC launched an investigation in April 2021 and later issued a preliminary report on EY, which will only be published to the public after considering whether its explorations should be changed only in the light of EY’s rejection. As a result of the rejection process, both sides, including a possible agreement to pay a fine of the audit firm, could be resolved.

The EY, which was paid $ 1 million for its final fall from its flotation in 2002 to monitor the NMC, stated in the written arguments that it was “greatly challenged” by the FRC search.

For administrators, lawyers quoted from the temporary report of the FRC’s 563-page that the regulator discovered why the NMC would not provide access to the general department was failed to question properly and a statement made by the NMC and a statement made by a company’s credit should be ignored.

Lawyers said that his report on the independence of the regulator also raised concerns because two employees of the Middle East were in the audience beyond the restrictions of ordinary time.

Lawyers also added that FRC discovered that an EY partner in the UK “was leaning toward pressure” [NMC’s] Clear threat to stop. The The Busy The The And failed to practice purposefulness from this point ”.

The case continues.