Education Department targets pregnant, LGBTQ staff protections

US Education Department pushes work protections for employee or LGBTQ personnel whose policies should be changed to the President Donald Trump’sExecutive Orderto “protect women from extremism of gender extremism.”

In a May 9 emails viewed at Bloomberg News, the agency invites unity to negotiate with “necessary changes in consolidations for changes.

It suggests that the word “pregnancy” will be removed from many clauses, including one specifically discriminated species for providing promotion. These rules are said to have declined discrimination or selecting participants for career development programs that are not available to participate in sexual workers from the Pedrention program.

The entry of the agency’s anti-harassment policy called for removing a reference to “sexual orientation, gender recognition, or pregnancy.” Spreadsheet also lists many policies where said the word “Difference,” replace singular “they” or replacing “sex.”

theDepartment of Education“The execution of President Trump’s executability in defense of all federal needs, to ensure the rules of law and the executive guidance. Gender. “

The Department of Education Department, a chapter of American federation of government employees, rejected agency efforts to change its contract, which was removed before Trump. “Ang ahensya wala’y ligal nga awtoridad nga magbag-o, magbag-o, magbag-o, magbag-o, ug / o magbag-o” sa Kontrata, ang lokal nga AFGE nga si Sheria SHERIA SHRAIA SHELIA SMITE nagsulat sa mensahe sa Mayo 16 nga email. He said the union would not agree voluntarily registered the agreements of this correspond to “defense of women” defending “if needed to change the rules of an unknown.

“The executive command does not seek our contract, and they know,” Smith said in an interview.

Smith, a lawyer in the department’s civil rights office whose job was included in a layoff currently blocked in court, characterized the department’s push for language revisions as an effort to curb workplace rights – including those of protecting employees – under the guise of protecting women.

The union message does not offer detailed arguments for suggested changes such as exmishing languages ​​about pregnancy, the US supreme revisions and anti-transgender of the true types of sex biases for the opinion for 6-3 most.

This story originally shown Fortune.com

Source link