‘American Psycho’ director says she’s ‘mystified’ by Wall Street bros obsessed with Christian Bale’s serial killer hero, saying they don’t realize the movie is a ‘gay man’s satire on masculinity’

• The director of American Psycho says many fans wrongly wrong with film. We “never expect it to be overwhelmed by Wall Street Bros,” says Maria Harron. The film celebrates 25^IK anniversary this year.

American Psycho often means a satire. The film, released in 2000, the Standard Christian Bale as Patrick Bateman, a New York City investment banker who is also a serial killer. Ever since, he became a matter of a gear favorite.

However, director Mary Harron said he was “mystified” in the “Wall Street Bros” idol that they had targeted the point in the film.

Bateeman may wear good suits and have money and power, but he, in his core, a fool, he himself – and the movie itself is a gay man in man of man, “he told the letter journal In an interview marking the film’s silver anniversary.

American Psycho Based on a book by the author Bret Bet Easton Ellis. Harron said “[Ellis] It is allowed to live to see homoerotic rituals among alpha men, which are also true of sports, and these things which are prompting their intense competition and their ‘lifting their life’ s kind. Something is good, so much about the way they look at the look and gym. “

This is also Keeps a Broadway Musical.

For that and other reasons Harron said he and other filmmakers who did not expect the film to have the financial community, a newer generation. However, the gild, gives the film another apple bite, as the clips of the bateman are often tacked by users.

“I’m always mystified with it,” Harron said. “I don’t think that [co-writer Guinevere Turner] And I hope to take it to the Wall Street Bros, everyone else. That’s not our goal. So, are we disappointed? I’m not sure why [it happened]Because Christianity is clearly joking them. “

The film was met with criticism from feminist groups before releasing it, with some taught toxic masculinity and mistake. After all, some are sustained from that, talking about Harron’s direction. Critical Roger Ebert, at the time, wrote “he changed a novel about the blood lust in a movie about vanity.”

This story originally shown Fortune.com

Source link