Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
With a jury selection for his second trial for murder in the death of a police officer in Boston John O’Keefe, a lawyer for Karen read They attract a lower judgment that he does not face a double danger of the Supreme Court of the United States.
The first trial was completed last year, but her lawyers claimed that the jury unanimously agreed that she was not guilty of two of the three charges, including the most serious murder, and that holding those in books for his second trial for a trial for the same crime.
This agreement, however, was unannounced at the trial.
Karen was on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. (Dario Alequin for Fox News Digital)
According to a 149 -page application, Reage lawyers represent a high court two questions:
- Whether it’s final and unanimous but unannounced, a jury decision The next trial That the prosecution failed to prove the defendant guilty of the accused crime, is a acquittal of exclusion in accordance with the double danger clause.
- Whether the defendant who provides credible evidence of such a final, unanimous and unannounced acquisition is entitled to a hearing after the trial to confirm the fact of such an acquittal.
Officer John O’Keefe poses for the official head. O’Keefe’s girlfriend, Karen Reed, is currently being tried for murder after being found dead outside the Massachusetts house in January 2022. (Police Directorate in Boston)
The fifth amendment guarantees constitutional protection against coping with double danger – a trial or sentence for the same crime twice.
After injury, it can usually be acted – but Read’s lawyers claim that unique circumstances in her case set up at a double danger Two charges Jurori agreed but did not announce.
Go here for complete coverage 2.
Karen Read and John O’Keefe poses in a undated photo. (Karen Read)
During the day of the stops stopped, the jurors repeatedly sent notes in court, explaining that they had been in a standstill, and Judge Beverly Cannone instructed them to continue trying. The discussions began on June 25, 2024 to July 1, and the jurors still died, the judge proclaimed the injury.
In their appeal, Reada’s lawyers said that the judge did not advice on any side opportunity to speak and dismiss the jury without asking them if they were locked under all charges or any charges individually.
Karen read the jury selection: dozens in the pool already have an opinion on the case
Karen Read sits in court during the jury selection in the High Court of Norfolk on Thursday, April 18, 2024 in Dedham, Massachusetts, at his first trial. (David McGlynn/New York Post by AP, Pool)
The next day, the juror was identified as a juror and the Reada lawyer, Alan Jackson, was contacted, and told him that the Council “unanimously agreed that Karen Read was not guilty of a point (second -degree murder),” the lawsuit said.
The text messages reportedly sent from the jurors B expressed similar claims, the lawsuit said. Jurors C and D also addressed the reader team with similar versions of events, according to the application submitted.
In addition, at least one juror said this in the speech post office for the plaintiff.
Follow the true criminal team on x
Karen read the smiles while defender David Yannetti spoke with reporters in front of a higher court in Norfolk after the judge declared the injury after the jurors failed to make a judgment after a two -month trial on Monday, July 1, 2024. In Dedham, Massachusetts. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
“It’s not guilty of the second stage,” Juror B wrote in a text divided with another reading lawyer to David Yannetti. “And he split half for another charged … I thought the prosecution did not prove the case. No one thought he had intentionally hit him or even thought he had intentionally hit him.”
In a telephone conversation, Reada lawyers claim that the juror B explained the second sentence of the text, saying that she should have read: “No one thought he had intentionally hit him or even knew she had hit him.”
Login to get A truly crime newsletter
Judge Beverly Cannone looks over the verdict that the jurors have to fulfill when they rendered a judgment in the Karen Reada murder on Wednesday, June 26, 2024. At the Superior Court Norfolk in Dedham, Massachusetts. (Greg derr
The accusation of murder was “out of the table”, according to the application, and the jurors also said that the jurors agreed that reading was not guilty of leaving the scene.
Reading was arrested on a drunken driving charges, murder and abandonment of the scene, and was later charged with an additional charge second -degree murder After allegedly withdrawing to O’Keefe in front of the party and drove away, leaving him to die on Earth in a snowstorm.
If her appeal is successful, she would just face the accusation of murder.
Karen Read appears with his lawyers, Alan Jackson and David Yannetti, during the first day of the jury selection on the Norfolk Superior Court on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. In Dedham, Massachusetts. (Nancy Lane
Click here to get the Fox News app
Appellation courts in Massachusetts They have already rejected her request, revealing that since the verdict was not read in court, there was no accusations exempt and not facing a double danger. This week, her legal team turned to the highest court in the country, asking them to review the lower court’s decision and to hed after an experiment on the matter.
Read could face life in prison if he was convicted of second -degree murder at her second trial, which began on Tuesday. She stated that she was not guilty and denied her involvement in O’Keefe’s death, and presented her as a sacrificial goat who framed the alleged true killers.
