Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
New York judge Analisa Torres ruled that the woman who accusing Jay-Z and Sean “Diddy” Combs that he raped her when she was 13 years old, he can remain anonymous for now.
Torres ruled Thursday that Jane Doe can remain anonymous, but reserved the right to review the decision in the future. If the case proceeds, Jane Doe may be required to reveal her identity, according to a court document obtained by Fox News Digital. Torres also noted that there is “considerable interest” from the public regarding the case.
The judge also addressed lawyers for Jay-Z (whose legal name is Shawn Carter) in the court document.
“Carter’s attorney’s relentless filing of combative motions containing inflammatory language and ad hominem attacks is inappropriate, a waste of judicial resources and a tactic that is unlikely to benefit his client,” Torres said, referring to Jay-Z’s attorney, Alex Spiro.
WATCH ON FOX NATION: WHAT HAS HE DONE?
The woman who accused Jay-Z of sexually abusing her when she was 13 has been allowed to remain anonymous. (Karwai Tang/WireImage)
“The court will not speed up the court process just because the lawyer demands it,” she continued.
Earlier this month, the music mogul filed a motion to dismiss the rape lawsuit. He also requested that the court reject the prosecutor’s request for an anonymous procedure. Jay-Z is accused of raping a minor along with Diddy at the 2000 MTV VMAs after party, according to the documents.
In his motion to dismiss, Jay-Z accused Texas attorney Tony Buzbee, who is Jane Doe’s attorney, of running “a sprawling extortion saga — one whose goal is low and measured in dollars.”
On Thursday, Buzbee told Fox News Digital, “Repeated attempts to discredit and smear advocates for alleged victims is a failed strategy.”
“Carter’s attorney’s relentless filing of combative motions that contain inflammatory language and ad hominem attacks is inappropriate, a waste of court resources, and a tactic that is unlikely to benefit his client.”
Spiro did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.
Spiro spoke at Roc Nation headquarters in New York on December 16 and said yes allegations against Jay-Z are “provably, provably false”.
Spiro was referring to a recent NBC News interview with an unnamed Alabama commit woman admits she made “some mistakes” when it was necessary to recount what happened at the VMA after party.
Jay-Z, left, and Sean “Diddy” Combs are both accused of raping a minor after the 2000 MTV VMAs, according to the lawsuit. (Kevin Mazur)
LIKE WHAT YOU READ? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
Spiro was keen to point out that these inconsistencies “are not small. . . . If you look at the timing, there’s no way that could happen.”
“I want to make sure this is clear: when people make up an account, whether on purpose or their mind is blank or something, they can always get that key part of the story right. They can just repeat it over and over and over again; that’s what happened, that key part, but they’ll always mess up the details, when something doesn’t happen, you’ll understand the details because you were really not there,” Spiro said, according to The Hollywood Reporter.
Alex Spiro is representing Jay-Z, whose real name is Shawn Carter, during the litigation. (Getty Images)
“[This was] it is not possible. That’s because this never happened,” he added.
CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE FOR THE FUN NEWSLETTER
Spiro noted that his client is “upset” about the situation.
Jay-Z is “upset” about the situation, according to his lawyer. (Monica Schipper/WireImage)
“He’s upset that someone would be allowed to do this, that he’d be allowed to make a mockery of the system like this. He’s upset that this is distracting and dissuading real victims from coming forward. He’s upset that his children and family have to deal with this. And he should be upset. “, he said.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
