Favoration for buffalo: Coach Stephen Edwards criticizes scoring and comment in Beterbiev-buffalo 2

The trainer Stephen Edwards considered the rematch between the undisputed light of the champions for heavywe in Artur Beterbie and Dmitrix and Dmitry Bivol, draft or narrow 115-113 for any guy. Edwards did not understand how one judge scored 8-4 (116-112) in the buffalo.

(Credit: Mark Robinson / Storm congenital in boxing)

Debate with an arrow

The judges reached a decision of a majority of 12 rounds in the buffalo benefit with marks 115-113, 116-112 and 114-114.

Edwards believes that judges did not give Beterbiev (21-1, 20 KOS) credit for the first round, which saw he won. Indeed, the judges banked all wounds in buffalo use, which did not match the real fight. It’s not just the first round. Moreover, the judge crew gave the buffalo to many circles that it seems to lose.

If you are conspiracy theories to explain why Bivol got victory last Saturday night in the fight that seemed to be pulling 114-114, you can think of something.

Some fans on social media believe that there was an agenda that Bivol would get victory because, business, there was potentially more money to make with him holding four belts. These are the reasons:

• Canelo Alvarez Remont
• Promoted Eddie Hearn
• David Benavidez: Mexican monster said to be preferred to fight buffalo than Beterbiev
• Dazn: buffalo is fighting on Dazn

One thing that bothered Edward was a comment from Dazn announcing a team that was last Saturday was Beterbie vs. Bivol 2. He felt the favorite buffalo were in full, even with the lobes of rounds. That’s something I noticed.

I had to turn off the sound Because what they said they did not suit the real combat. They all sounded like part of the fan that was rooting for a buffalo. It was weird. You could say to whom they are favored, not only during the fight. Even before the match began, they sounded preferential towards the buffalo. It is difficult commentators to hide their bias, but the crew that worked for a fight has done a bad job to do it.

Comments commentary

“I don’t like the way he (Dazn) announces all that makes Godol. In the first part of the fight, Beterbiev had a good circle and showed the peak in the first struggle,” Stephen Edwards said, said Stephen Edwards Mills boxingHe talks about favorites, commentators of Dmitry Bivola proved for Dmitry Bivol in her fight against Artur Beterbie’s last Saturday night.

“I told myself,” If it’s close, they will give him a buffalo. “There was no separation between the two. The fight looked like pulling. Down, I thought Beterbiev won at the tenth, Beterbiev won her twelve.

“The fight was in balance that descended down the shares. I have no problem with 6-6, which is 114-114. I have no problem with 115-113. I felt Beterbiev took middle rounds, and the buffalo returned. It was a thing on my back and forward. I think Beterbiev didn’t get credit for an early circle, “Edwards said.

She was still a fight. That is why it is disappointing to see that two judges have so wrong and give the buffalo unanswered victory. The commentator from the Dazn broadcasting team made it sound like the overall domination for buffalo.

“In the first round, I thought Beterbiev won, but someone said that Bivol increased 30-27,” Edwards said. “I felt Beterbiew might have won the first round. It was a lot of happened. He was probably another pulling, but it was a little edge edges. Then, when it (Beterbiev) was in the last round, I thought it would think it would be 6-6 or 7-5.

“I was actually shocked to hear 116-112. No guy won eight circles,” Edwards said Judge, Mike Fitzgerald, who achieved the fight in the buffalo.

The comments “The (Dazn) must be completely objective. I feel, many times are biased. For two struggles in a row, they favor buffalo consistently, even re-behavior.